Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts

Friday, May 2, 2014

The Growing Controversy Around the Death Penalty


  

Other than the tiny island nation of St. Kitts and Nevis, the US is now the only country in the Western Hemisphere that executes its citizens.  This week the death penalty is back in the news after a botched execution in Oklahoma.

In the United States about 58% of Americans say they favor the death penalty according to a 2012 Gallup poll.   The US Supreme Court ruled in the 1976 Gregg v. Georgia case that the death penalty does not violate the 8th Amendment's guarantee that all American's are free from cruel and unusual punishment -as long as the punishment isn't cruel.  Americans may point to Saudi Arabia's beheading of prisoners, Iran's hanging of gay teens, and China's harvesting of executed prisoners' organs as barbaric, but unlike almost all of Europe and the rest of the Americas where the death penalty has been stopped or abolished, Americans still support the death penalty as long as it is nice and peaceful.  It's fine if the government kills a convicted criminal when they give him a final meal, shoot him up with drugs, and the condemned just doesn't wake up from a peaceful slumber.

But now the European manufacturers of the drugs formerly used for lethal injections have cut off America's execution industry.  So states are scrambling to find alternatives whose less than peaceful outcomes are making Americans squeamish.  In January Ohio tried a new lethal injection cocktail to execute Dennis McGuire.  It took him more than 20 minutes to die as he writhed strapped to a bed wheezing and gasping for air in "agony and terror" according to his children who are now suing Ohio for torturing their father to death.

This January Oklahoma also executed Michael Lee Wilson whose final words were that his entire body was on fire -something the supposed drug cocktail used should not have produced.  The cocktail Oklahoma uses is supposed to put a prisoner to sleep before the final drug shuts down the prisoner's heart.  This final drug, however, is known to create an excruciating burning if a person is not unconscious.

This week Oklahoma again botched an execution.  Instead of peacefully falling into eternal sleep to pay for what admittedly were horrific crimes, Clayton Lockett writhed in agony for 40 minutes while one of his veins exploded.  The executioners stopped the execution but then Lockett died of a heart attack.  At least some accounts say his heart literally EXPLODED in his chest.  Unable to find a suitable vein in an arm or leg, the drugs were administered through Lockett's groin.  

Now these botched executions are adding fuel to the debate around the death penalty.  Will public opinion and the American courts continue to support the death penalty if America grows squeamish about the government executing citizens whose lives end in agony?  If convicted of a crime, would you rather be guillotined?  shot?  or writhe in pain for 40 minutes strapped to a gurney?  

If you commit murder in the US, data show you are more likely to be executed if you are male and black.  Is this fair?

Also, where you are convicted of a capital offense in the United States, however, will dictate if a) you will receive the death penalty, b) if it will likely be carried out, and c) how it will be carried out.  Is this fair?

By far you are most likely to be executed in the United States' execution capital per capita:  Oklahoma.  Since 1976 Oklahoma has executed 1 Oklahoman for ever 36,000 residents.  When Danish drug manufacturers cut off selling the drug most commonly used for lethal injection in the US because of its use in executions, Oklahoma and other states shifted to finding other lethal injectables.  The state even went so far as to try to hide what drugs it is using and who is making these drugs.  It is likely more lawsuits and more debate will be forthcoming on this issue.



Monday, April 14, 2014

Updated Marriage Map


After the rush of court rulings in the first three months of 2014, April has been relatively a slow news period. The new Federal court rulings on same-sex marriage have created even greater complexity.  Judges in Tennessee and Indiana have ruled those states must recognize civil marriages performed out-of-state...but only for the plaintiffs in the lawsuits involving those cases.  So, this means Indiana must recognize the marriage of a lesbian couple in Evansville where one of the spouses is dying.  In Tennessee the judge ordered the state to recognize the three couples suing the state for recognition of their marriages.

Today an Ohio judge ordered that state to recognize marriages legally performed out-of-state.  He will decide tomorrow whether to stay his decision or not.

As for the number of states with and without a lawsuit seeking recognition of same-sex marriage, it is a challenge knowing which states have such lawsuits.  Lambda Legal put out a press release that to expect a lawsuit in Georgia this week, but there is no news there yet.  So stay tuned.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Same-sex Marriage Lawsuits: The Holdouts

17 states now have same-sex civil marriages.  The Federal government recognizes legal same-sex marriages regardless of in which state a couple live.

In all but 9 of the other states, there are now active lawsuits seeking the state benefits of marriage and the ability to marry in these states.  The 9 holdout states listed in order of 2013 estimated populations are:


  • Ohio, 11.6 million*
  • Georgia, 9.9 million
  • Mississippi, 3 million
  • Kansas, 2.9 million*
  • Nebraska, 1.9 million*
  • Montana, 1 million*
  • South Dakota, 0.8 million
  • Alaska, 0.7 million*
  • North Dakota, 0.7 million
Those states with an asterisk ("*") do not currently have lawsuits directly seeking the legalization of same-sex marriage, but they do have pending lawsuits involving related issues such as listing spouses on death certificates, listing step-parents on birth certificates, recognition under workplace law, foster parenting, etc.  These related lawsuits could impact marriage legalization overall.

So, the real holdouts are the couples in Georgia, Mississippi, and the Dakotas who have yet to file suit.


Thursday, February 27, 2014

UPDATE: Marriage Map

This week there have been a number of changes affecting civil marriage laws in the United States.  So, it is time for another map update:

a. Yet another Federal judge -the 6th I think- has ruled that a state's ban on offering civil marriage and its benefits and responsibilities to same-sex couples violates the US Constitution.  This week a judge in Texas ruled that the Texas ban was unconstitutional.  The ruling has a stay on it while the case can be appealed by the state government.

b. In Kentucky another Federal judge today lifted his stay on an earlier ruling that the Bluegrass State must recognize marriages legally performed in other states.  The state's Democratic Attorney General has asked for a 90 day stay so that the state can decide to either appeal or prepare.  For KY's couples married out of state, confusion abounds about how to complete their taxes.  Currently they can file jointly their Federal returns as married but must submit state returns separately as single.  No word yet on how today's decision will affect tax filings.

c. The increasingly legal complexities are making my little map also more complex.  I've now added Ohio to the states recognizing out-of-state marriages because the Federal court ruling there orders the state to recognize such marriages on death certificates.  This ruling, however, if on appeal too.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

UPDATED MAP: Kentucky!!!! and Same-Sex Marriage Lawsuits

The legal situation involving the push to legalize same-sex marriage in most of the states is rapidly changing. As of today new lawsuits in Wisconsin, Missouri, and Louisiana are expanding the states with legal challenges to same-sex marriage bans.  A previous lawsuit in Louisiana was dismissed in December over legal standing issues.

Also, a new lawsuit in Ohio does not seek the legalization of same-sex marriages at the state level there. Instead it seeks to have the names of both parents listed on birth certificates when an Ohio or out-of-state adopting couple are legally married elsewhere.  This Ohio case would expand on an earlier Federal judge's ruling that Ohio must list same-sex spouses legally married elsewhere on Ohio death certificates.  That case is being appealed.

And today a Federal judge in Texas is hearing a challenge to that state's same-sex marriage ban.  Nevada's Attorney General also announced she will not defend Nevada's same-sex marriage ban from a legal challenge there because of the ban's likely unconstitutionality.

UPDATE:  Even as I posted this map over lunch, a Federal judge in Louisville, KY, ruled that my home state of Kentucky must recognize same-sex couples legally married in other states.  This particular lawsuit did not address whether same-sex couples could marry in Kentucky.  So now Kentucky will either join Oregon in recognizing same-sex couples married elsewhere or join Utah and Oklahoma in appealing this ruling.

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

January 2014 Status of Same-sex Marriage in the US


The status of same-sex marriages and their legal recognition is rapidly changing in the United States.  Let's do a quick recap:

Federal:  In 2013 the US Supreme Court overturned the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which barred federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married in the United States or abroad.  As a result, same-sex marriage is basically legal in all 50 states ...in terms of Federal benefits.  So, if you get married in a state allowing same-sex marriages, various Federal agencies will recognize your marriage regardless of whether you live in a state with legal same-sex marriage or live in a state without same-sex marriages.  Thus, a couple in Kentucky can marry in Illinois and file their Federal taxes jointly, sign up their spouse for military benefits, be treated as a married couple for the purposes of immigration, etc.  In other words, these couples will be treated in theory no differently than any other legally married couple.

At least this is the case in theory.  Several states which ban same-sex marriages are requiring these married couples to file separately on their state taxes -even though the state forms require referencing their joint Federal tax return.  What a headache!

17 States With Legal Marriage:  In 17 states, DC, and in six tribal nations, a same-sex couple can walk into the property local office, apply for, and get a marriage license.  (See the dark blue states on the map above.

Utah:  In December 2013 a Federal judge threw out Utah's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and opened the doors for hundreds of Utah couples to marry.  Utah requested a stay on the decision until the state government could appeal the decision.  The original judge and the 10th Circuit of Appeal both turned down a stay.  Utah then appealed to the US Supreme Court which in January 2014 granted a stay until the appeal could be heard.  So now the lower court's decision is being appealed, and the status of the hundreds of newly married couples is unknown.  In the only similar situation when CA legalized and then banned same-sex marriages, the courts recognized those couples who had married when marriage was legal there. (It is legal again since 2013 in California by the way).

Ohio:  Another Federal judge in Ohio ruled in 2013 that Ohio must recognize same-sex couples who have legally married in another state on death certificates.  So, this ruling is narrow and only involves death certificates.  In this case and in Utah, both judges relied on the recent US Supreme Court's ruling on DOMA.

Oregon:  Oregon has offered same-sex couples civil unions since 2007.  It also has a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.  Now there are efforts to remove this constitutional amendment in Oregon and legalize marriage.  In the meantime the state has announced it will recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states and abroad.  A lawsuit is also challenging the state ban on marriage.

North Dakota:  In a truly bizarre legal twist, North Dakota's attorney general ruled in 2013 that a North Dakota man who had married another man in another state could marry a woman in North Dakota ...without getting a divorce!  The potential bigamist could not get a divorce from his husband in ND because neither he nor his husband lived in states recognizing same-sex marriage.  Since ND doesn't recognize his marriage, the ND Attorney General ruled he could legally marry a woman in ND.

Lawsuits in 20 States:  As of January 8, 2014, there are legal cases pending in 20 states (including UT and Oregon) seeking to have these states recognize same-sex marriages.

Other 12 States:  In 12 states same-sex marriages are banned, and I could find no current pending lawsuits challenging these bans.  In Ohio the death certificate case opens the door for a wider challenge.  Wyoming's legislature considered a civil unions bill but shot it down.  In Florida the leading LGBT organization is reportedly seeking plaintiffs to challenge that state's ban.  Missouri's governor has said the state will recognize legally married same-sex couples for tax purposes but some members of the legislature are vowing to fight this regulatory policy change.

Navajo Nation:  The Navajo Nation's reservation lands include areas of New Mexico where same-sex marriage became legal in 2013, but a 2005 law bans same-sex marriage recognition by the tribal government.  There is now a push to legalize same-sex marriages in the Navajo Nation.  If successful, the Navajos would join 8 other tribes where same-sex marriages are now legal and recognized.