Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts

Monday, March 10, 2014

The Typical American, Unions



Most American workers are not unionized.  So the typical American is not a union member.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) estimates 9.2 million current American workers belong to unions.  Unions also include millions of retired workers not counted in the 9.2 million current workers figure.

For those American workers, however, who are unionized and working in the private sector (rather than a union of state/Federal employees), they will earn 23% more than non-unionized workers.  The BLS also reports 94% of unionized workers in the private sector are offered health insurance by their employers compared to 67% of non-unionized private-sector workers.  Union workers also have a higher percentage of their health insurance premiums paid by their employer and receive more benefits such as sick leave, paid vacation, retirement, and life insurance benefits.

According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a bit more than 1 in 10 US workers are unionized.  This compares to Iceland where 79.3% of worker are unionized.  In fact, in all the Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland), the majority of workers are in unions.  On the other hand, fewer than 10% of workers in South Korea, Turkey, Estonia and France are unionized.


Friday, March 7, 2014

The Typical American, Work

Like nearly two-thirds of the population (64.7%), Jennifer, our Typical American, is part of the labor force. She is currently employed as a teacher, health care worker, social worker, or similar service worker (22.9%).

Jennifer works for a wage at a private company (78.7%) that provides her with a health insurance benefit.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

What Do Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson, A Gay Teacher, Paula Deen, Martin Bashir, and An Expectant Boston Catholic Couple Have in Common?

Americans love their free speech.  Our big mouths are mouthing off about something all the time.  The Internet -an American invention after all- seems ready made to give the power of owning your own newspaper to anyone with a computer, blog, or Facebook.  I'm a case in point for sure.

This week brings another minor skirmish in America's culture wars with Phil Robertson, the patriarch of the Duck Dynasty reality TV show, inciting anger and a public backlash over expressing his personal views that black Americans were happier under segregation and that he lumps gay families in with the rape of animals (bestiality) and other sins.  While outside of the American mainstream, Robertson's views are probably not uncommon among his generation of working class whites in rural Louisiana.  Keep in mind that Paula Deen -who is 66 and from a white, working class background in rural Georgia- admitted using the "N word" in a court deposition.  She was quick to add that while this racist epithet was common in her youth in the South, it is no longer acceptable.  Under contract with the Food Network, the channel dropped Deen over the uproar from the racially charged lawsuit against her by a former employee.  Likewise, Robertson is under contract with the A&E channel.  Yesterday, his employer cut him from the show for his public remarks.

Robertson's remarks drew condemnation from the NAACP, GLAAD and others.  Others disagreed with his remarks but upheld his right to express his personal viewpoint -some out of free speech concerns and others out of support for his conservative interpretation of Christianity.  A&E's suspension in turn drew condemnation for Robertson supporters.

This post explores the issue of free speech and the workplace.

First of all, our US laws protect citizens' free speech from government interference.  Employers frequently put restrictions on employees' free speech as a condition of their employment.  These restrictions and situations arising from them come up across the political spectrum.  Cases in point:


  • A Pennsylvania Catholic school recently fired a popular teacher who has worked at the school for 12 years.  Why?  He and his long term male partner sought and received a license to marry in neighboring New Jersey.  The school felt his marriage would violate Catholic teachings -and thus also his contract.
  • In Massachusetts another Catholic school recently fired two heterosexual teachers.  Their wrongdoing?  They had begun dating and were expecting a child out of wedlock.  The school said their pregnancy violated their contracts.
  • Paula Deen lost her cooking show, book deals, and a sizable chunk of her cooking empire after an African American employee filed a racial discrimination case and Deen admitted to having used the "N word" in the past.
  • MSNBC suspended Martin Bashir for nasty remarks for public figure Sarah Palin.  He later resigned.
  • MSNBC and Alec Baldwin also parted ways this year after MSNBC cancelled his show and suspended him after video went public of him shouting anti-gay slurs at paparazzi.  
  • Now A&E have suspended Phil Robertson over at Duck Dynasty for violating his contract for expressing his opinions in a public GQ interview.  
The three teachers would likely either have their jobs or have good standing for wrongful termination if they worked at a public school.  They didn't:  they signed on to teach at Catholic schools that have particular morality clauses in their contracts.  Robertson's views would be mild in comparison to the viewpoints put forward on the Rush Limbaugh or other shows, but he agreed to work for A&E -on their terms.  

The point here is that when you sign a contract or agree to employment with a company, you are often agreeing to limit your free expression of your opinions and beliefs.  You might feel these seven people were wronged, but the law says they signed onto these jobs knowing the restrictions.  Be aware.




Sunday, October 20, 2013

ENDA: The Employment Non-Discrimination Act

Majority:  Most registered American voters support a Federal law banning employment discrimination because of a person's sexual orientation.

While recent media attention focuses on same-sex civil marriage, it remains legal to discriminate against a person because of her or his sexual orientation in most states.  Ironically, earlier and a recent poll find most Americans believe such discrimination is already illegal.  Thus, some Americans believe attempts at a gay rights law banning employment discrimination is instead some attempt at 'special rights'.  Such laws fall within the system of civil rights laws already existing in the US and thus cover heterosexuals as well as homosexuals and bisexual orientations.

A September 2013 national poll by Republican pollster Alex Lundry with TargetPoint Consulting finds that 80% of Americans incorrectly believe it is already illegal to fire, refuse to hire, demote, or otherwise discriminate in employment against a person because of her/his sexual orientation. A law to ban such discrimination currently is gaining steam before Congress.  ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, would ban discrimination based on an individual's sexual orientation and gender identity in the area of private and public employment.  The bill exempts religious organizations and private clubs as well as only applies to businesses with 15 or more employees.(1)

Supporters have tried to get ENDA passed since 1994.  A similar bill had been introduced to Congress for decades starting in 1974.(1)

Lundry's polling finds 68% of his sample of registered voters support a Federal law protecting against sexual orientation discrimination in employment.  3 out of 5 registered voters believe sexual orientation discrimination is a problem in the US -with 31% believing such bias is a major problem.

Lundry also calculated that a majority of voters in all 50 states support such legislation.